We were please that our work was included, with an interview about
collaboration by Kyle Seis in Generous Magazine Issue 2, Winter 2016.
Generous is a periodic publication that foregrounds new work by those
who create outside the confines of the cannon. Generous takes risks and
values spontaneity.
Our work was commissioned as
Exquisite Duos.
|
Exquisite Duos Interviews by Kyle Seis |
|
Founders/Editors - Khine Hline, aryn kresol, Nate Pyper, designer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERVIEW
Barbara Ciurej
How does a collaborative art practice compare to a traditional marriage?
I have wilder dreams when I sleep in the studio.
What were you making before connecting with Lindsay?
I
was obsessed with a pair of red spiked heels that belonged to my
mother. I was setting up and photographing narratives starring the
shoes. Turns out Lindsay fit into those shoes. I was also working on a
project trying to picture infinity.
How has living in different cities affected your process?
Double
everything. We can be in two places at the same time. Information
multiplies and migrates. Spheres overlap. I appreciate that distance
gives space and time to think and research separately before coming
together in the studio. As I make the two-hour trek from Chicago for a
stay at the studio in Milwaukee, it is a welcome meditative interlude.
Would your practice be radically different as an individual?
I
would still be working with photography but I wouldn't be having as
much fun and I certainly would not get as much done. We started working
collaboratively so early in our formative years, trying to move beyond
our individual experience into the collective realm, that it is hard to
imagine how I would tackle those themes without finding another
collaborator. Because I have maintained a dual career as a photographer
and a graphic designer, I think my formalist tendencies would be more
evident.
What have you learned from Lindsay?
How to argue.
I used to back away from arguments but now see them as part of a
rigorous practice. There is tension in collaborating but good tension
that suspends the work between our divergent points of view. We argue
over everything – from exasperatingly trifling topics like how small
is
a small dog to big issues like social responsibility. Learning to
reason through and defend your choices is articulation of vision.
The value of experimenting.
Lindsay is a tireless experimenter. Just when I think we are finished
with a project, she will tear it apart, print it backwards, turn it
upside down, see what happens if we bend the frame. I am more reluctant
to do that but admit that approach yields surprises and pushes the work.
Even when we throw away all the experiments, there is a sense we have
left no stone unturned in testing the work.
An irreverant attitude.
She has always had a more heightened worldly sense while I tend to
float in idealism. I have learned to do more research and critically
question assumptions, canons and historical narratives, which is
essential to the projects we produce.
Lindsay Lochman
How does a collaborative art practice compare to a traditional marriage?
I’m
not sure what a traditional marriage is.…..like Adam and Eve? Ward and
June Cleaver? Maybe you mean a traditional artist marriage, like
Eleanor and Harry Callahan?
So consider these comparisons:
We have not made collaborative vows to each other at church or in city hall,
but
you must not assume that the images we have produced are illegitimate.
We have never had sex, but when mind-melds sometimes occur, it is
thrilling. It may be possible to consider our collaboration to be like a
menage a trois: photographs, Barbara and me.
Prior to Barbara, did you ever envision sharing a practice with someone?
Prior
to meeting Barbara, I considered myself a potential artist. This notion
was not encouraged, however, because it was feared I might turn out
like my Aunt Cordelia.
At that time, the dawn of post-modern art,
artistic collaboration was only beginning to be a way of making
artwork.Our collaboration was totally unanticipated or premeditated.
After so many years, it remains very organic in it’s structure and
somewhat mysterious, even to us. It’s not an arrangement for the faint
hearted artist.
What did your first work together look like?
Like ritualistic nose-thumbing in White Sands, New Mexico.
What are the biggest differences between you and Barbara?
Our
brains. Although we share a similar visual aesthetic and production
standards, differences can be seen in the way we process information and
in our working methods.
My work is a non-linear
embrace of ideas, processes and research which I combine and transform
through manipulation with my fingers. I produce objects and images for
evaluation. Barbara is wide open to experience, fulfilled by
communication and interaction with humanity. Her process displays focus,
patience and optimism; she is skilled in the use of InDesign.
What does the future look like?
I
don’t know, but that is why we are beginning a project concerning
Divination. We do continue to explore the bleak metaphorical landscape
of childcare in America and we have also made plans to flee the four
walls of our studio and make photographs en plein air.
Future
exhibitions include Forged Worlds in DUMBO organized by Sam Barzillay
at United Photo Industries (July 29th 1916 through July 2017); Processed
Views at the Colorado Photographic Arts Center (October 14 - November
23, 2016). The rest is a surprise for us to know, and for you to find
out…Our work is currently featured in Lost in Space: Contemporary
Photographers and the New Landscape at Rick Wester Fine Art, NYC through
July 29th.