data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44919/44919859535af8dcf1030b287104ff7c11285557" alt=""
It is thought that Venus was born 31,000 – 40,000 years ago at the beginning of the Aurignacian era. What were they thinking then? Was the depiction of oversized breast, exentuated buttocks and genetalia a deliberate exaggeration of the sexual features? Are these proportions unrealistic or wishful thinking? Do these figures resemble your grandmother or pornography?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edb0e/edb0e1bdb6a5de26e4e921222398955843694fd9" alt=""
Catalhoyuk Goddess
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a1bd5/a1bd51ceb54d9915a0c8fadc557d4306555b7f1f" alt=""
Cucuteni Venus, Drăguşeni, 4050-3900 B.C
Cycladic Venus, 2800 to 2300 B.C.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7252/f7252ab424571869cac7506873d4775c6d594bd8" alt=""
Venus Dolni Vestonice Gravettian Czech
No comments:
Post a Comment